Tennessean Senior Editor Deborah Fisher mentioned during her presentation to the Nashville PRSA chapter yesterday that the paper plans to operate a “24/7 newsroom” within six months that will publish local updates to its Web site around the clock.

Currently, the paper publishes about 100 breaking news updates each day beginning at 6 a.m. Fisher’s goal is for the site to be “dynamic and refreshing constantly.” “Update, update, update is our mantra,” she said.

I’m glad to see this move by the paper. As a media junkie, I say the more news, the better, and it’s always encouraging to see additional local content arriving online.

If you have a problem with Al Gore living in a colossal Belle Meade Mansion and generating high electric bills while traveling the world to discuss the dangers of global warming, that’s fine. Whether or not Gore is a hypocrite, we need to be aware of our energy consumption and consider how we can change the way we generate the power we depend on.

As today’s Tennessean reports on Gore’s MTSU address yesterday, scientists aren’t questioning whether we need to change our habits. They’re looking for ways to solve the challenges we face:

A 10-year University of California study found that essentially zero percent of peer-reviewed scientific journal articles disagreed that global warming exists, whereas, another study found that 53 percent of mainstream newspaper articles disagreed the global warming premise.

He noted that recently the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released its fourth unanimous report calling on world leaders to take action on global warming.

In my opinion, it’s not worth abandoning strategies for smarter, greener energy just because Gore may–or may not–be saying, “Do as I say, not as I do.”

Want to peek inside the Preds’ locker room? Sports Illustrated writer Michael Farber has written a great story that includes plenty of details about the team’s behind-the-scenes atmosphere:

[Barry] Trotz, the only coach in Predators history, mixes realism with an inveterate optimism. In the days leading to Saturday’s game, Predators’ coaches were forbidden to bring up their Thursday-night loss to the Montreal Canadiens, in which Nashville squandered three two-goal leads and lost in a shootout. Anyone caught talking about how Nashville had kicked away a precious point would have been expected to contribute to the Negativity Fund — a so-labeled plastic container in the coaches’ office that staff members pay into for spreading bad vibes. On Friday associate coach Brent Peterson wrote energy and patience on a whiteboard as coaching guidelines for practice. Then he began to write NO S-A-R.. before stopping. “How,” he asked, “do you spell sarcasm?”

The stakes will be high over the next few weeks as the Preds continue their playoff run, but Farber reveals that the team engages in other matchups with nearly the same intensity:

The most riveting pre-Red Wings activity came on Friday at the clubhouse Ping-Pong table at which Forsberg, who says he was unbeaten during his season and a half with the Flyers, dropped games to winger Martin Erat and to goaltender Tomas Vokoun, before avenging the loss to Vokoun as teammates yelped. When the table tennis ended, hockey practice began: a sprightly, energetic session. No negativity anywhere.

Forsberg may have his hands full on the ping-pong table, but it looks like he’s starting to fit in just fine in the locker room and on the ice. I’ve loved watching this team on the ice since year one in 1998, and it’s great to hear a little bit about how things play out away from the rink, too.

Senior editor Deborah Fisher mentioned today during her presentation to the local PRSA chapter that The Tennessean will launch a redesigned business section sometime in March. The section will feature more local content and include regular features such as “How I solved it” for business challenges, “How I started it” for new businesses, more columns by local business people and an increased focus on entrepreneurs.

Alongside this new content, the paper will include “real, practical information” such as tax deadlines and an expanded calendar page with an emphasis on networking events and opportunitities because, as Fisher noted, “Nashville is a heavy networking city.”

The section will feature a different “niche” page each day with reporting on the following areas: development, Music Row, real estate, automotive, health care and small business. People in Business, the paper’s current weekly business announcements section, will appear on a daily basis corresponding to the day’s niche page. Movers and Shakers, which Fisher mentioned as a popular item, will remain on the section’s front page.

Fisher hopes that the section will reveal more of the “flavor of Nashville.” In my opinion, this is good news for a section that frequently has more stock listings than editorial content. It will hopefully provide increased information about the local business community.

Tennessean senior editor Deborah Fisher spoke to the Nashville chapter of the Public Relations Society of America today and addressed the current and future direction of the newspaper. Fisher became senior editor this past December and has been heavily involved in the recent content changes in the print edition and the paper’s significant embrace of its Web site and social media in the past several months.

While The Tennessean isn’t announcing any major personnel changes or abrupt shifts in its focus, this presentation came in the wake of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution’s February 21 announcement that it will shift its content for younger readers to the Web and focus its print edition on an older audience. Fisher explained The Tennessean’s reasoning behind its changes in content strategy:

“The Tennessean wanted to restructure because the way people get information has changed so much… It’s not just the paper reaching people any more … So many people have moved online. Many use PCs or PDAs to get breaking news online during the day. Our goal is to provide news when they want it and how they want it.”

Fisher acknolwedged the organization’s concerns about recent downsizing and acquisition trends in the industry and specifically mentioned the AJC’s unexpected announcement. As the Poynter Institute’s Rick Edmonds recently said about the Atlanta announcement, The Tennessean is yet another paper trying “to find the magic balance between print and online.”

While The Tennessean is not abandoning its print edition or altering it on the drastic level that the AJC is proposing, Fisher acknowledged that the paper’s print circulation is declining, as it is for nearly all papers across the country, and that online page viewing is booming: “The web is definitely seeing a double-digit increase. It’s huge. There has been a phenomenal growth in page views and unique visitors. There’s a whole set of metrics that we look at.”

In discussing strategy, Fisher returned consistently to variations on the following talking points, including references to “getting information to people in different ways” and “continuing the conversation.” These phrases and the messaging below echo the mission and values of The Tennessean’s parent company Gannett:

“Everything in the world of journalism eventually comes down to the reporter. Good journalism really does start with the reporter, and it comes down to the reporter’s passion for his or her beat. That passion ends up leading to a good story.”

When asked, Fisher said that she did not foresee a time when the newspaper would abandon its print edition:

“As long as people want to consume information in different ways, I think there will always be a print product. There are some limitations to the Web. Newspapers will go away when books go away. I think there will be a print edition for a long time. We will have to continue editing it for what people expect. I don’t think the print edition will entirely go away.”

I will share more details from Fisher’s presentation today later this afternoon.

The Tennessee Center for Policy Research is right to question Al Gore’s personal energy consumption in the wake of his well-publicized efforts to raise awareness of global warming. In my opinion, anyone advocating a strong public policy position or philosophy ought to be willing to subject himself or herself to this kind of scrutiny:

[TCPR president Drew Johnson said,]“We went into this just asking the question, ‘Is the leader of the environmental movement basically living up to his word? Given that he’s a Tennessean, I thought it’s a question we should ask.”

I’m sure the Gores can do more to save their own little corner of the world, and they should, but it sounds like they are doing a decent amount, despite reports yesterday to the contrary. In addition to voluntarily purchasing blocks of green power from Nashville Electric Service in recent months, the Gores also have done the following, according to The Tennessean’s Anne Paine:

They use compact fluorescent light bulbs and are in the midst of a renovation project that includes having solar panels installed on their home to reduce fossil fuel consumption … Their car? A Lexus hybrid SUV… [They also participate in a process known as carbon emissions offset, which] means figuring out how much carbon is emitted from their power use, and vehicle and plane travel, then paying for projects that will offset that with use of renewable energy, such as solar power.”

Could the Gores do more? I’m sure they could, and so could I.

[Asides to TCPR: Thanks for hiring Trent Seibert and keeping him around. How about an RSS feed for your Web site, too?]

According to researchers involved with the latest results in the annual Narcissistic Personality Inventory (link leads to PDF with detailed info), which has published an assessment of college students’ sense of self since 1982, today’s college students are more self-centered than their predecessors. The experts blame a “self-esteem trend” that began in the 1980s and technology innovations such as MySpace and YouTube.

Maybe they’re right, but I wonder how people of all ages would fare on such a study these days. If we are becoming more self-centered–and there’s plenty of evidence to support the theory–I wonder whether it has less to do with being in college and more to do with being a 21st-century American. I have a feeling that college students from the 60s, 70s or 80s would answer the survey similiarly if they were exposed to today’s me-focused pop culture.

The Tennessean didn’t post this Associated Press story online, but it did run it on today’s front page and included an interview with MTSU vice president of student affairs Bob Glenn, who has worked on campus for 36 years. He disputes the findings:

“Everybody wants to make out this generation as worse than previous generations … I don’t see this particular group of students as much more narcissistic than those in the 60s, who were engaged in a whole variety of interesting behaviors … I see a surge in a lot of things that are optimistic … I see them doing a lot more service activities. I see these students being much more inclined in doing things that have positive impacts on their communities. I don’t want to be too quick to label them and hesitate to write them off because of what one group of researchers said.”

I’m sure this study is worth noting, but I’m also weighing it with a grain of salt. Why? I remember very well the outcry over my own “Generation X” in the early 90s: We were slackers who were apathetic about everything, and we were going to ruin America. Well, at least that was the most exaggerated of the criticisms leveled against my generation, and in my opinion they’ve turned out to be wrong.

It seems to me that generations in American society tend to have a natural rivalry that evolves over time, and it’s a common pastime for older ones to call out rising successors for their ills. Sure, my generation has its shortcomings, and so do the Boomers and even the Greatest Generation.

There may well be some validity to the study, but I think we’d all be better off looking at how we can change ourselves for the better than trying to nudge our older or younger peers a little further down the generational hill.

I agree with Coach Trotz that the current Preds road trip is likely to only help make Nashville an even better team as it enters the stretch run before the playoffs:

One of the plusses of the Predators’ longest road trip of the season — five games over 10 days — is that the team will get some bonding time with recent acquisitions Peter Forsberg and Vitaly Vishnevski. “You can say all you want while you’re at home, but you don’t bond as well,” Predators Coach Barry Trotz said. “Over the next 10 days, we’re going to be on the road and it’s a bunch of guys together on the road, sort of against the world. We just have to bear down and hopefully pull together.”

One benefit of having all eyes on Forsberg since the trade is that Vishnevski has likely been able to integrate with his new team that much more easily. He isn’t the one who’s every move is being watched, and so far he appears to be fitting in well.

I was encouraged over the weekend not only by Peter Forsberg’s excellent play and game-winning goal against Detroit, but also by reading the following further explanation in The Tennessean about his decision to decline Coach Trotz’s request that he participate in the shootout at the end of Thursday night’s game with Montreal:

Forsberg explained Friday why he told Trotz he’d prefer not to be one of the top three shootout participants in Thursday’s game against Montreal. Forsberg wound up shooting fourth and slipped to the ice before getting off a quality attempt. “To be honest, I don’t think I’m the best goal-scorer in the league,” Forsberg said. “If you look at the statistics, I’ve got more (assists) than goals. I think this team has a lot of breakaway guys.”

I was admittedly being a little hard on Forsberg, but I suppose that’s because of the level of expectations that superstars tend to generate. As I mentioned on Friday, we’re all human, even athletes and other people who excel at a high level of performance, but one thing that distinguishes superstars is that they tend to outperform the rest of the field sooner or later and on a regular basis. Two things that distinguish great athletes from great leaders is the ability to acknowledge one’s strengths and weaknesses and the ability to see how one’s skills can best align with the rest of the team’s talents.

Forsberg broke out of what might be considered a mini-slump and recorded his first two points as a Predator as Nashville downed the Red Wings 4-3 in overtime in front of a sellout crowd. Keep in mind that this is the second consecutive week that Forsberg has downed the Red Wings by scoring the clinching goal:

In his final appearance with the Philadelphia Flyers last week, Peter Forsberg scored the game-winning goal in a victory over the Detroit Red Wings. It might not have been a showdown game — the Flyers long had fallen out of playoff contention — but it did provide yet another example of Forsberg sticking it to the best team of the last decade.

Keep in mind that this appeared in an article that ran in Saturday’s paper, prior to that night’s heroics by Forsberg. I’m not expecting that Forsberg–or any other Pred–will score every game, but I’m glad to see him begin to contribute. I imagine that we’ll see a lot more assists, goals and, hopefully, wins in the near future, thanks to Forsberg and the rest of the Preds.

It’s not really fair to be questioning this so soon after such a huge trade, but last night’s game has me wondering a bit. Consider this item from John Glennon’s recap of the Preds’ 6-5 loss to Montreal last night:

Predators Coach Barry Trotz asked center Peter Forsberg whether he wanted to be one of the top three shootout participants against the Canadiens, but Forsberg declined.”He said he didn’t want to go as one of the first three,” Trotz said. “He just said it wasn’t something he didn’t feel real strong about, so I listened to him.”Forsberg was the fourth Predators shooter, but slipped as he neared the Montreal crease and failed to get off a quality attempt.

Peter Forsberg is reportedly a humble locker-room leader, so maybe he’s just deferring to the team’s established leaders. I attended the game last night, and it was a little disconcerting to learn after the fact that Forsberg turned down Coach Trotz’s first request to participate in the shootout. Putting him on the ice in the sudden-death round with the game on the line added even more pressure, and even NHL superstars are human and can’t make a spectacular play every time.

The trade is already paying dividends in the stands and around the city, and the team can afford the steep price it paid because it didn’t require a big departure from the current roster. There are rumblings around the league that Forsberg may already have it in mind to return to Philadelphia in the offseason, but some of those rumors are from Flyers fans who are disappointed about an unexpectedly awful season for their favorite team.

Forsberg has made no promises to the Preds, but he did waive a no-trade clause in his contract to allow the deal to happen. He was serving as Philadelphia’s captain, though, and perhaps he sees this move as a way to help the Flyers’ future because he has been limited so far this season for them on the ice.

I hope he will at least give Nashville the honor of keeping an open mind about our team and our community. This could very well be a great place for him to earn another championship, whether this year or thereafter, and it could be a great and welcoming place for him to complete his career, too.

Playing in two quick home games after arriving as the savior via a blockbuster trade will put pressure on anyone, even a premier athlete. The long road trip that starts next week will be a big challenge for the team, but I have a feeling it will be a very good thing for Forsberg’s Predators tenure.

As happens more often than not, I agree with Liz and her ode to Councilman Eric Crafton in this week’s Scene:

We do conduct our business in English and always have. Not once, as editor of a newspaper that makes frequent requests for public information—and roots around daily in the recesses of government offices for documents and other city goings-on—have we encountered an arrest record, a legal filing, a personnel file, an interview with a bureaucrat, or any other manifestation of municipal business in a non-English format. Well, except for the usual Metro-mangling of the English language—e.g., “let me have him to call you,” “you can quote me per beta,” or the classic plea for secrecy, “I need this to be unanimous.” (And there’s always the Metro Council favorite: “I have a qwerstion….”) …

That said, you have accomplished wonders in uniting some of the city’s most fragmented factions. There could not be a more widely assorted, contradictory cast of characters who find your intention repulsive. The Scene and Bishop David Choby…on the same side? Liberadio! and the Nashville Area Chamber of Commerce? Bizpigs and African American clergy? The list of multifarious hand-holders who have come together for what may be the first and last time goes on and on—a testament to how spurious and ill-motivated your scheme truly is …

Here you are, assuming that others who find themselves needing to learn a new language don’t have the same willingness and eagerness you did. It’s unfounded. No doubt when you were in Japan you tried to speak the language the best you could, but you probably needed a little sympathetic assistance from time to time—a stranger recognizing your effort, and reaching to meet you halfway. That’s all your mob of critics is saying.

Instead, by saying you’ll back the effort to put the measure on the August ballot, you’re assuming the worst of people in (or off) the same boat. And by trying to create a law where none is required, you’re diluting the good nature of Nashville’s citizens.

The last point here is the one that bugs me the most. This is a great place to live with a lot of kind-hearted people in it. We’re consistently named the nation’s friendliest city (although occasionally not to the homeless), and there are wonderful and amazing things taking place here as people continue to discover and explore Nashville. Yes, we have problems, but our ability to communicate in English is not one of them. How does this help us when we have bigger problems, including Dickerson Pike, to tackle?

Sam and Dixon ’s idea is catching on, judging from this morning’s Tennessean.

Instead of giving up soda, chocolate or swearing for Lent, some Midstate Christians are planning to volunteer at senior centers, spend five-minutes-a-day on social activism or pledge to crush their used Starbucks coffee cups to be more ecologically conscious…

The Rev. Thomas Hotchkiss of Church of Advent Episcopal is encouraging congregation members to combine the act of personal penance with charity work. “Giving up chocolate is something beneficial to oneself, which may OK, but taking all the money that everyone spends on candy bars and sending it to relief of children in Northern Uganda has an impact,” he said. “That’s what we’re trying to get people to think on.”

Someone who woke up very early on the wrong side of the bed disagrees:

Let me get this str8 (pun intended)… For 40 days, which ends at Easter, these people are no longer burdened with denying themselves chocolate (or other self indulgences), lying, swearing, buying soda, leaving a tip, recycling or anything else which would make them a ‘better’ christian? So on Easter Sunday, praise the lord, they can now curse, lie, eat diet cokes, leave no tips etc? No wonder this is their biggest holiday!

Frankly, I doubt Jesus is impressed. If I were Lord and Savior, I sure wouldn’t be.

What a wretched religion. What a trite concept and practice…giving up something for 40 days which one shouldn’t be doing anyway. If y’all were serious about this, I propose something different…instead of 40 days, the following should give up or practice the following forever:

-Catholic Priests should give up molesting children forever, and confess to law enforcement about the ones they did abuse. Catholic Bishops shouldn’t cover things up.

-Baptists should go to a gay bar and embrace every gay guy there, not as an abomination, but as another one of God’s creations.

Eh, nevermind, these things ain’t gonna happen. In Jesus name we burp, and hold off on self-indulgence, swearing, lying and not-tipping until Easter morning, amen.

I can’t argue with the sentiment, only the presentation. Regardless, Jesus is quoted in the Bible as saying “I desire mercy, not sacrifice.” I have no issue with the traditional practice of Lent, observed sincerely, but I think this alternative take on 40 days better matches the God’s hope for us.