Or should we blame Purcell?
Wednesday, July 11th, 2007Did Bill Purcell’s relatively early announcement that he would not seek a third term (a possibility which, to be fair, may not have been legal under the city charter) throw a wrench in the mayoral race, too? Reading this Nashville Scene article written one year ago, I can’t help but wonder:
District Attorney Torry Johnson was at the YMCA working out earlier this week when a curious voter asked him the question everybody wants answered: is he or isn’t he running for mayor? Johnson’s answer hasn’t wavered, whether he’s talking to constituents or impatient reporters: he’s still trying to decide.
He says the office of mayor is “interesting” and “intriguing”—the kind of position he’d be willing to make sacrifices for. At the same time, he’d been planning to run for district attorney last spring when Mayor Bill Purcell announced he wouldn’t try for a third term, leaving the field open for three candidates who leapt into the void. “The announced candidates said they were in practically from the minute Mayor Purcell’s announcement reverberated through the city,” Johnson says. “I’d been focused on the DA’s race up to that point. Only then did people start talking to me about being mayor. So I’m coming at this a little bit differently.”
According to a source with knowledge of the DA’s inner circle, Johnson is almost certain to run. The same source says Johnson’s closest confidants put the likelihood at 90 percent.
Here’s hoping no one had money on Johnson as a 90-percent “sure thing” last summer. There’s a funny thing about the near certainty of 90 percent, too: That 10 percent still keeps coming back around and winning out oh, about one out of every 10 times.



