<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Signature Tower: A lame name</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinktrain.net/2007/07/26/signature-tower-a-lame-name/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinktrain.net/2007/07/26/signature-tower-a-lame-name/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Music City Bloggers &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Maybe it should be called the &#8216;Mine&#8217;s Bigger Than Yours&#8217; tower</title>
		<link>http://thinktrain.net/2007/07/26/signature-tower-a-lame-name/#comment-1687</link>
		<dc:creator>Music City Bloggers &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Maybe it should be called the &#8216;Mine&#8217;s Bigger Than Yours&#8217; tower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinktrain.net/2007/07/26/signature-tower-a-lame-name/#comment-1687</guid>
		<description>[...] of thinktrain is not too impressed with the nomenclature for the proposed ginormous Signature tower: I think the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of thinktrain is not too impressed with the nomenclature for the proposed ginormous Signature tower: I think the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
