Would Preds owners play “hardpuck?”
Tuesday, February 12th, 2008Completion of the Preds’ new lease deal with the city of Nashville has taken longer than many expected after an agreement was completed in principle last fall. If negotiations continue to lag, how tempted will the new ownership group be to stick with the original lease?
Hanging over negotiations is the possibility that the Predators could complete this season under the existing lease, fail to average 14,000 tickets a game and invoke an escape clause. The team’s last regular-season game would be on April 4.
“Without a new lease (and with the current low ticket sales), the Team can leave at the end of this year and pay the City approx $18 million … unless the Team is put in default, and we file an injunction that prohibits them from leaving,” Lawrence wrote in his memo.
Such a move, coming so soon after they bought the team with the promise that they would do everything possible to keep it in Nashville, could seriously damage the reputations of the mostly local owners.
I think this is the multi-million dollar question. My guess is that Freeman and company have little interest in exercising the escape clause, but I’m curious whether any of this becomes leverage behind the scenes if those completing the deal continue to be mired in the details. I sure hope not.





